The policy to state HOTS in Basic Competence (KD) of 2013 English curriculum and English teachers’ practice in developing indicator achievement

Main Article Content



(1)  Oikurema Purwati   
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Indonesia

(2)  Ahmad Munir   
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Indonesia

(3) * Gusti Nur Hafifah   
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Higher order thinking skills (HOTS) are already a trend in educational sector. The concepts of HOTS are applied in statements of ‘basic competences’ (as known as KD) in the 2013 English Curriculum (syllabus). The purpose of stating HOTS concepts in ‘KD’ to make all of the process of teaching and learning resulted on the students’ ability to be able to think and practice higher order thinking skills in their daily life. As represented in the ‘basic competences’ (KD) of 2013 English curriculum (syllabus revised edition), HOTS can be considered as the significant point in developing indicator (as the objective) of teaching and learning. The development of indicators should be in line with the theory of HOTS, from analyzing, evaluating and creating (based on the revised Bloom taxonomy). However, there are a lot of English teachers who still get difficulties in developing appropriate teaching learning indicators in fulfilling HOTS concepts. In national practice, the policy of implementing HOTS as the basic competences may not be carried out fully by the Indonesian English teachers. There is also a tendency to ignore the discussion of developing appropriate indicator achievement as the learning objectives.


HIGHLIGHTS:


  • Curriculum developers should comprehend the concepts of the curriculum and the language theories applied to the curriculum.

  • Basic competence should be developed following the level of Bloom's cognitive skills, particularly to generate students' higher-order thinking.

  • Implementation of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) as a policy in the 2013 English Curriculum Basic Competencies (KD) and English teachers' practices in developing competency achievement indicators

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Purwati, O., Munir, A., & Hafifah, G. N. (2022). The policy to state HOTS in Basic Competence (KD) of 2013 English curriculum and English teachers’ practice in developing indicator achievement. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 7(2), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v7i2.1662
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Oikurema Purwati, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Oikurema Purwati is an associate professor at Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia. She is interested in ELT and English education curriculum policies in Indonesia.

Ahmad Munir, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Ahmad Munir, S.Pd., M.Ed., Ph.D., is a lecturer at Surabaya State University. He teaches various courses related to ELTs. He also conducts a lot of research and publishes his articles in reputable international journals.

Gusti Nur Hafifah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

Gusti Nur HAFIFAH, M.Pd. is an assistant professor at English Department, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya. She is a Doctor of English Language Teaching from Universitas Negeri Malang. Her research interests are in ICT in ELT, Teacher Professional Development, TESOL Method and Strategy, Curriculum and Material Development. She has published some articles related to ICT in ELT national and international indexes and presented her papers to some international conferences of ELT. She has involved in Teachers Professional Development program to enhance teachers’ capacity in ELT strategy and method and ICT integration for language teaching.

References

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. (2001). Anderson and Krathwohl Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised Understanding the New Version of Bloom’s Taxonomy.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Pearson Education Group.

Beacco, J.-C., Fleming, M., Goullier, F., Thürmann, E., & Vollmer, H. (2016). A handbook for curriculum development and teacher training.

Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E. P., & Mark, J. (2021a). Contemporary curriculum issues: Organizing a curriculum around Mathematical habits of mind. The Mathematics Teacher, 103(9), 682–688.
https://doi.org/10.5951/mt.103.9.0682

Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E. P., & Mark, J. (2021b). Contemporary curriculum issues: Organizing a curriculum around Mathematical habits of mind. The Mathematics Teacher, 103(9), 682–688. https://doi.org/10.5951/mt.103.9.0682

Dharma, Y. P., Joni, T., Aristo, V., Persada, S., & Sintang, K. (2018). An analysis of English textbook relevance to the 2013 English curriculum. Journal of English Educational Study, 1(1), 6611. https://doi.org/10.31932/JEES.V1I1.277

Ghonsooly, B., & Showqi, S. (2012). The effects of foreign language learning on creativity. English Language Teaching, 5(4), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n4p161

Graves, K., & Lopriore, L. (2009). Developing a New Curriculum for School-Age Learners. TESOL Language Curriculum Development Series. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. 1925 Ballenger Avenue Suite 550, Alexandria, VA 22314.

Guardado, M., & Light, J. (2020). Curriculum Development in English for Academic Purposes: A Guide to Practice. Springer Nature.

Indriyana, B. S., & Kuswandono, P. (2019). Developing Students Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in reading: English teachers strategies in selected Junior High Schools. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 5(3), 204. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v5i3.1313

Indriyanto, B. (2012). Pengembangan kurikulum sebagai intervensi kebijakan peningkatan mutu pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 18(4), 440. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v18i4.100

Kaya, S., & Ok, A. (2016). The second grade English language curriculum: Theory-practice congruence. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 6(4), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2016.024

Kohler, M. (2019). Language education policy in Indonesia: A struggle for unity in diversity. In The Routledge international handbook of language education policy in Asia (pp. 286-297). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666235-20

Kostka, I., & Bunning, L. (2017). Curriculum design in English language teaching. TESOL Press. Available from: TESOL International Association. http://www.tesol.org.

Li, H., Liu, J., Yang, X., Xiao, J., & Yang, G. (2016). An empirical study on developing higher-order thinking skills of primary students with e-schoolbag. Proceedings - 2016 International Symposium on Educational Technology, ISET 2016, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET.2016.26

Lie, A. (2007). Education policy and EFL curriculum in Indonesia: Between the commitment to competence and the quest for higher test scores. TEFLIN Journal, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V18I1/1-15

Madya, S. (2002). Developing standards for EFL in Indonesia as part of the EFL teaching reform. TEFLIN Journal, 13(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.15639/TEFLINJOURNAL.V13I2/142-151

Mickan, P., & Wallace, I. (2019). The routledge handbook of language education curriculum design. In The Routledge Handbook of Language Education Curriculum Design. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315661032

Moore, A. (2012). Teaching and learning: Pedagogy, curriculum, and culture. Taylor and Francis.

Null, W. (2017). Curriculum: From theory to practice (Second Edi). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. www.rowman.com

Nurhattati, Matin, Buchdadi, A. D., & Yusuf, C. F. (2020). Teacher certification in Indonesia: An education policy analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1719–1730. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080508

Permendikbud No. 20, 21, 22, dan 23 Tahun 2016 dan Permendikbud No.24 Tahun 2016. (n.d.). Retrieved August 18, 2022, from http://20283530.siap-sekolah.com/2016/09/02/permendikbud-no-20-21-22-dan-23-tahun-2016/#.Yv4GoHZBw2w

Porter, P. A., & Brown, D. (1997). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), 814. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587769

Rachmawati, D. L., Purwati, O., Anam, S., & Setiawan, S. (2021). Between perception and practice: The emergency of encouraging EFL teachers to implant HOTS in their classrooms. TESOL International Journal, 16(4.4), 40–58.
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667220

Setyono, B. (2016). Providing variations of learning modalities to scaffold pre-service EFL teachers in designing lesson plan. Prosiding Ictte Fkip Uns 2015, 1(1), 336–343.

Sholikah, E., Suprihadi, S., & Nuraeningsih, N. (2021). Relationship between Higher-order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and English achievement. Prominent, 4(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.24176/pro.v4i1.5791

Soenoewati, D. I. D. (2015). English core competencies, basic competencies, and assessment for junior high school in curriculum 2013; between facts and hopes. Register Journal, 8(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v8i1.1-18

Sukmawijaya, A., Yunita, W., & Sofyan, D. (2020). Analyzing Higher Order Thinking Skills on the compulsory English textbook for tenth graders of Indonesian Senior High Schools. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature), 5(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v5i2.10565

Widodo, H. P. (2016). Language policy in practice: Reframing the English language curriculum in the Indonesian secondary education sector. In English language education policy in Asia (pp. 127-151). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22464-0_6

Wilson, L. O. (2013). Understanding the new version of Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Second Principle, 721(2001), 1–16.

Yunita, W., Syahrial, & Hati, G. M. (2020). English teachers’ knowledge on higher order thinking skills (HOTS). ENGLISH REVIEW: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.25134/ERJEE.V9I1.3800