Technology use in secondary level of English language teaching: A Literature Review


  • (1)  Roghibatul Luthfiyyah            Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon  
            Indonesia

  • (2) * Gusti Nur Hafifah            Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya  
            Indonesia

  • (3)  Francisca Maria Ivone            Department of English, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang  
            Indonesia

  • (4)  Sintha Tresnadewi            Department of English, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang  
            Indonesia

    (*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Technology has been widely used in the education field, especially for teaching language. Many teachers and students believe in the advantages of technology to enhance language learning. There have been many studies investigating the use of technology in secondary language classrooms. Some studies approve that technology can be applied to increase students' language competence. This paper comprehensively analysed the use of technology for English language teaching in the secondary level based on empirical studies. It reviews 57 articles from reputable journals and publishers. The existing literature shows that studying and reviewing the use of technology in ELT leads to a deeper understanding of its potential benefits. Many technology tools have been utilized to support the teaching of English skills. Kinds of learning activities that require technological tools and applications, such as presentation, discussion, assessment are also discussed. Additionally, problems and solutions encountered in the implementation of technology in secondary ELT levels are scrutinized in this study.

HIGHLIGTS:

  • Scholars need to set the content and pedagogy first before the technology to obtain meaningful and contextual experiments and discussion in academic circumstances.
  • The finding unveils a fact that technology use in the ELT context contributes more to students' learning strategies, such as learning motivation, engagement, collaborative work, rather than the improvement of students' learning outcomes.
  • This finding can be a rationale to rectify the common logical fallacy encountered among studies that claimed that technology can improve particular language skill.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Roghibatul Luthfiyyah, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon

She is a faculty member of Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon, West Java-Indonesia. She is currently pursuing her doctorate degree in Universitas Negeri Malang. Her main research topic interests are in the area of assessment in language teaching, technology-enhanced language learning, and teacher professional development.

Gusti Nur Hafifah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

English lecturer of English Department, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya. She is currently finishing her PhD in English Education in Universitas Negeri Malang and doing research on Teacher Cognition on ICT in ELT. She is also interested in doing further research on Teacher Professional Development, Curriculum and Material Development and TESOL strategies and methodologies.

Francisca Maria Ivone, Department of English, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang

Francisca Maria Ivone currently teaches at the Department of English, Universitas Negeri Malang in Indonesia. She holds a Master of Arts and Doctor of Philosophy in Applied Linguistics from The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Her research and publications are in the area of ELT, TELL, CALL, Extensive Listening and Viewing (EL/V), Extensive Reading (ER), learning autonomy, and collaborative learning. She is passionate about the use of technology in language teaching and learning. She also gives training to pre-service and in-service teachers on the use of technology in language teaching and learning, ER, and EL/V.

Sintha Tresnadewi, Department of English, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang

Sintha Tresnadewi is one of the faculty members of the Department of English Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia, with more than 30 years of teaching experience. Her research interest includes English language assessment, autonomous learning, the teaching of English as a foreign language, and current issues in education.

References

Acquah, E. O., & Katz, H. T. (2020). Digital game-based L2 learning outcomes for primary through high-school students: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education, 143(March 2019), 103667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103667

Ahmed, K., & Nasser, O. (2015). Incorporating iPad technology: Creating more effective language classrooms. TESOL Journal, 6(4), 751–765. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.192

Ahn, T. youn, & Lee, S. M. (2016). User experience of a mobile speaking application with automatic speech recognition for EFL learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 778–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12354

Andrei, E. (2017). Technology in Teaching English Language Learners: The Case of Three Middle School Teachers. TESOL Journal, 8(2), 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.280

Anikina, Z., Sobinova, L., & Petrova, G. (2015). Integrating Telecollaboration into EFL Classroom: Theoretical and Practical Implications. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206(November), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.045

Ansyari, M. F. (2015). Designing and evaluating a professional development programme for basic technology integration in English as a foreign language (EFL) classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(6), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1675

Aşık, A., Köse, S., Yangın Ekşi, G., Seferoğlu, G., Pereira, R., & Ekiert, M. (2019). ICT integration in English language teacher education: insights from Turkey, Portugal and Poland. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1588744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1588744

Averkieva, L., Chayka, Y., & Glushkov, S. (2015). Web Quest as a Tool for Increasing Students’ Motivation and Critical Thinking Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206(November), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.042

Balchin, K., & Wild, C. (2020). Exploring the role of context and collaboration in normalising technology use in English language teaching in secondary schools in Malaysia. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1803360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1803360

Barrot, J. S. (2018). Facebook as a learning environment for language teaching and learning: A critical analysis of the literature from 2010 to 2017. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 863–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12295

Bhattacharjee, B., & Deb, K. (2016). Role of ICT in 21 st Century’s Teacher Education. International Journal of Education and Information Studies, 6(1), 2277–3169.

Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Digital Competences and Long-Term ICT Integration in School Culture: The Perspective of Elementary School Leaders. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 769–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9456-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9456-7

Boonyopakorn, J. (2016). Technology Enhanced Language Learning on English Communication for EFL Learners. Proceedings of The 10th International Multi-Conference on Society, Cybernetics and Informatics (IMSCI 2016), 200–205.

Börekci, R., & Aydin, S. (2020). Foreign language teachers’ interactions with their students on Facebook. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1557691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1557691

Chang, B., & Lu, F. C. (2018). Social Media Facilitated English Prewriting Activity Design and Evaluation. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0363-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0363-0

Chen, C. M., Tan, C. C., & Lo, B. J. (2016). Facilitating English-language learners’ oral reading fluency with digital pen technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.817442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.817442

Chen, M. P., Wang, L. C., Zou, D., Lin, S. Y., & Xie, H. (2019). Effects of caption and gender on junior high students’ EFL learning from iMap-enhanced contextualized learning. Computers and Education, 140(December 2018), 103602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103602

Chien, S. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers and Education, 146, 103751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751

Chou, P. N., Chang, C. C., & Lin, C. H. (2017). BYOD or not: A comparison of two assessment strategies for student learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.024

Chu, S. K. W., Capio, C. M., van Aalst, J. C. W., & Cheng, E. W. L. (2017). Evaluating the use of a social media tool for collaborative group writing of secondary school students in Hong Kong. Computers and Education, 110, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.006

Curcic, S., & Johnstone, R. S. (2016). The Effects of an Intervention in Writing with Digital Interactive Books. Computers in the Schools, 33(2), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1181478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1181478

Dooly, M., & Sadler, R. (2020). If you don’t improve, what’s the point? Investigating the impact of a flipped online exchange in teacher education. ReCALL, 32(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000107

Engeness, I. (2018). What teachers do: facilitating the writing process with feedback from EssayCritic and collaborating peers. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1421259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1421259

Ersanli, C. Y. (2016). Improving Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) of Pre-Service English Language Teachers. International Education Studies, 9(5), 18. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p18

Fix, N., Kolesnikov, S., & Petrova, G. (2015). Using Electronic Courses in Teaching Master’s Degree Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206(November), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.021

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. (2015). Teaching and Learning with Technology:Effectiveness of ICT Integration in Schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00453.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596

Goodwin, A. L., Low, E. L., Ng, P. T., Yeung, A. S., & Cai, L. (2015). Enhancing Playful Teachers’ Perception of the Importance of ICT Use in the Classroom: The Role of Risk Taking as a Mediator. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.8

Graham, C. R., Borup, J., Pulham, E., & Larsen, R. (2019). K–12 Blended Teaching Readiness: Model and Instrument Development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1586601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1586601

Gunduz, N., & Ozcan, D. (2017). Implementation of the Moodle System Into EFL Classes. Profile: Issues in Teachers´ Professional Development, 19(_sup1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n_sup1.68571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n_sup1.68571

Gürkan, S. (2019). Effect of Annotation Preferences of the EFL Students’ on Their Level of Vocabulary Recall and Retention. In Journal of Educational Computing Research (Vol. 57, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118796843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118796843

Ha, M. J. (2016). Linking adverbials in first-year Korean university EFL learners’ writing: a corpus-informed analysis1. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(6), 1090–1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1068814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1068814

Hafifah, G. N., & Sulistyo, G. H. (2020). Teachers’ ICT literacy and ICT integration in ELT in the Indonesian higher education setting. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.762050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.762050

Hamzaoğlu, H., & Koçoğlu, Z. (2016). The application of podcasting as an instructional tool to improve Turkish EFL learners’ speaking anxiety. Educational Media International, 53(4), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2016.1254889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2016.1254889

Hockly, N. (2014). Online intercultural exchanges. ELT Journal, 69(January), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu061

Hockly, N. (2015). Online intercultural exchanges. ELT Journal, 69(1), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu061

Hockly, N. (2016). Special educational needs and technology in language learning. ELT Journal, 70(3), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw033

Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Tai, K. H. (2020). Effects of gamifying questions on English grammar learning mediated by epistemic curiosity and language anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1803361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1803361

Hong, Z.-W., Huang, Y.-M., Hsu, M., & Shen, W. (2016). Authoring Robot-Assisted Instructional Materials for Improving Learning Performance and Motivation in EFL Classrooms. Educational Technology and Society, 19(1), 337–349.

Hsieh, Y., & Huang, S. (2020). Using an E-book in the secondary English classroom: Effects on EFL reading and listening. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10036-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10036-y

Hwang, W. Y., Shih, T. K., Ma, Z. H., Shadiev, R., & Chen, S. Y. (2016). Evaluating listening and speaking skills in a mobile game-based learning environment with situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 639–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016438

Kangas, S. E. N., Hammond, T. C., & Bodzin, A. M. (2019). Using geospatial technology to teach language and content to English learners. TESOL Journal, 10(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.422

Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., & Chiu, K. F. (2017). Improving Hong Kong Secondary school students’ argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning & Technology, 22(1), 97–118. https://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/243899

Lamb, M., & Arisandy, F. E. (2020). The impact of online use of English on motivation to learn. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1–2), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1545670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1545670

Lan, Y. J. (2015). Contextual efl learning in a 3D virtual environment. Language, Learning and Technology, 19(2), 16–31.

Lee, S., Kuo, L. J., Xu, Z., & Hu, X. (2020). The effects of technology-integrated classroom instruction on K-12 English language learners’ literacy development: a meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1774612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1774612

Liu, H., Lin, C.-H., & Zhang, D. (2017). Pedagogical Beliefs and Attitudes toward Information and Communication Technology: A Survey of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8221(July), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572

Love, M. L., Spies, T. G., & Morgan, J. J. (2017). Using E-Books to Acquire Foundational Academic Vocabulary. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217693368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217693368

Mirzaei, A., Rahimi Domakani, M., & Rahimi, S. (2015). Computerized lexis-based instruction in EFL classrooms: Using multi-purpose LexisBOARD to teach L2 vocabulary. ReCALL, 28(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344015000129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344015000129

Mompean, J. A., & Fouz-González, J. (2016). Twitter-based EFL pronunciation instruction. Language Learning and Technology, 20(1), 166–190.

Morgan, D. N., & Chenowith, N. H. (2017). “This I Believe” About the Teaching of Writing: Secondary Teachers’ Digital Essays About Their Pedagogical Understandings. Reading Horizons (Online), 56(3), 52–66. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1947428619?accountid=174776

Muslem, A., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Juliana, R. (2018). Perceptions and Barriers to ICT Use Among English Teachers in Indonesia. Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 3–23.

Neumann, K. L., & Kopcha, T. J. (2019). Using Google Docs for Peer-then-Teacher Review on Middle School Students’ Writing. Computers and Composition, 54, 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524

Park, Y., Xu, Y., Collins, P., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2018). Scaffolding learning of language structures with visual-syntactic text formatting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12689

Radhakrishnan, J. (2017). Strategies for Technology Enhanced Language Learning (TELL) in Language Classes. International Journal of Interdiciplinary Research in Arts and Humanities (IJIRAH), 2(1), 162–165.

Regan, K., Evmenova, A. S., Good, K., Legget, A., Ahn, S. Y., Gafurov, B., & Mastropieri, M. (2018). Persuasive Writing With Mobile-Based Graphic Organizers in Inclusive Classrooms Across the Curriculum. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417727292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417727292

Selcuk, H., Jones, J., & Vonkova, H. (2019). The emergence and influence of group leaders in web-based collaborative writing: self-reported accounts of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1650781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1650781

Shang, H. F. (2015). An investigation of scaffolded reading on EFL hypertext comprehension. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 293–312. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1735

Silviyanti, T. M., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2015). EFL Teachers’ Perceptions on Using ICT in Their Teaching: To Use or to Reject? Teaching English with Technology, 15(4), 29–43.

Sokolova, E., Rostovtseva, V., & Wasilewski, M. (2015). The Advantages of the Network-Based Electronic Teaching Package by the Implementation of English for Specific Purposes Course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206(November), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.054

Sundqvist, P. (2019). Commercial-off-the-shelf games in the digital wild and L2 learner vocabulary. Language Learning and Technology, 23(1), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.125/44674

Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers and Education, 94(March 2016), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008

Tseng, J. J., Lien, Y. J., & Chen, H. J. (2016). Using a teacher support group to develop teacher knowledge of Mandarin teaching via web conferencing technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.903978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.903978

Turchi, L. B. (2020). Shakespeare e-books: an account of promising practice. Research in Drama Education, 25(1), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2019.1687290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2019.1687290

Valtonen, T., Sointu, E. T., Kukkonen, J., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). Insights into Finnish First-Year Pre-Service Teachers’ Twenty-First Century Skills. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2055–2069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9529-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9529-2

Wilson, J., & Roscoe, R. D. (2020). Automated Writing Evaluation and Feedback: Multiple Metrics of Efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 87–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119830764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119830764

Woodrich, Megan and Fan, Y. (2017). GOOGLE DOCS AS A TOOL FOR COLLABORATIVE WRITING IN THE MIDDLE SCHOOL CLASSROOM. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16(december), 391-410. https://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/3870

Yastibas, A. E., & Yastibas, G. C. (2015). The Use of E-portfolio-based Assessment to Develop Students’ Self-regulated Learning in English Language Teaching. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.437

Yükseltürk, E., Altiok, S., & Baser, Z. (2018). Using game-based learning with kinect technology in Foreign Language education course. Educational Technology and Society, 21(3), 159–173.

Zarzycka-Piskorz, E. (2016). Kahoot It or Not? Can Games Be Motivating in Learning Grammar? Teaching English with Technology, 16(3), 17–36.

Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2020). Types, purposes, and effectiveness of state-of-the-art technologies for second and foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744666

Picture in here are illustration from public domain image (License) or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published
2021-04-12
 
How to Cite
Luthfiyyah, R., Hafifah, G. N., Ivone, F. M., & Tresnadewi, S. (2021). Technology use in secondary level of English language teaching: A Literature Review. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.1020
Section
Reviews