Autonomous learning features: A case study in an Indonesian ESP classroom

Langgeng Budianto; Andrea R Mason

doi:10.21070/jees.v7i1.1213

(1) * Langgeng Budianto Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang
Indonesia
(2) Andrea R Mason Idaho University, USA
United States
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v7i1.1213

Abstract

This article explores autonomous learning features and effective strategies for meeting the needs of the autonomous learner. A 4-month ethnographic study examined the learning features of three non-English major undergraduates enrolled in an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course at an Indonesian university. The study also explored the students’ and teacher’s understanding of how the ESP classroom can benefit the autonomous learner. Data gathered through interviews, focus group discussions, and classroom observation indicate four key autonomous learning features: 1) a willingness to accept responsibility; 2) dedicated planning; 3) implementing effective strategies; and 4) monitoring progress. The findings also indicate that a variety of scaffolded and authentic learning materials combined with a flexible and creative teaching approach enhance autonomous learning. We also address how our results are applicable to most educational situations as autonomous learning is not limited to the language classroom.

HIGHLIGHTS:

The three subjects indicated different processes of autonomy such as monitoring learning progress using a specific task, holistic approach, and regular reflection strategies.
Adopting and promoting a spirit of independent learning provides ESP learners with a supportive framework to develop and practice autonomous learning habits
The ESP learners not only required to learn general English but also to learn specific English (their content knowledge in English) as their major. This is the novelty of the study. Therefore, this study provides specific add to the theory of autonomous learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Langgeng Budianto, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang

Langgeng Budianto is a lecturer at UIN Malang. He has presented papers in International conferences; KoreaTESOL, MELTA Malaysia, Africa TESOL, LSCAC Vietnam, Asia TEFL etc. He publihed several articles in Scopus; CALL-EJ, TEwT, IJICC, and TDE. He has been active reviewer in Scopus indexed Journal of IJI, TEwT, and TESL-EJ.

Andrea R Mason, Idaho University, USA

Andrea Rene Mason finished her master degree in TESOL at the University of Idaho USA. She has been currently teaching English at the English Dept of UIN Malang. She has published several articles in TESOL Journal. Besides, she has been very active presenting papers in TESOL International conferences.

References

Armitage, A., Evershed, J., Hayes, D., Hudson, A., Kent, J., Lawes, S., Poma, S., & Renwick, M. (2012). Teaching and training in lifelong learning (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press

Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.

Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2019). Language learner autonomy in a tertiary context: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 9-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817725759

Bradford, A. (2007). Motivational orientations in under-researched FLL contexts: Findings from Indonesia. RELC, 38(3), 302-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688207085849

Budianto. L. (2014). Students’ Autonomous Learning through ICT based Learning in ICP: A case study.LINGUA, 9(2), December 2014. 128-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v9i2.2734

García-Botero, G., Questier, F., & Zhu, C. (2019). Self-directed language learning in a mobile-assisted, out-of-class context: Do students walk the talk? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(1-2), 71-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1485707

Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369704800103

Hartnett, M. K. (2015). Influences that undermine learners’ perceptions of autonomy, competence and relatedness in an online context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1526

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ilter, B. G. (2009). Effect of technology on motivation in EFL classrooms. Turkish Online Journalof Distance Education-TOJDE, 10(4).

Jay D. A. (2006). Motivating for writing through blogs. A Master thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University. Available online at http://etd.ohiolink.edu

Jiajing, G. (2007). Designing an ESP course for Chinese university students of business. The Asian ESP Journal, 3(1), 97-106.

Johns, A. M. (2013). The history of English for specific purposes research. In B. Paltridge &S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for Specific Purposes (pp. 5-30). WestSussex: John Wiley&Sons, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339855.ch1

Kassim, H. & Zuraina, A. (2007). The use of ICT in the implementation of student-centered learning (SCL). Internet Journal of e-Language Learning & Teaching, 4(1). pp. 15-31.

Kohonen, V., Jaatinen, R., Kaikkonen, P., & Lehtovaara, J. (2014). Experiential learning in foreign language education. New York, NY: Routledge DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315840505

Lamb, M. (2004). ‘It depends on the student’s themselves’: Independent language learning at an Indonesian state school. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 17(3), 229-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310408666695

Lai,C. (2017).Autonomous language learning with technology. Beyond the classroom.London & New York: Bloomsbury Academy

Lauder, A. (2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: A review of key factors. Makara, Social Humaniora, 12(1), 9-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v12i1.128

Lengkanawati, N. S. (2017). Learner autonomy in the Indonesian EFL settings. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 222-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i2.4847

Li, Y., & Wang, L. (2018). An Ethnographic Exploration of Adopting Project-Based Learning in Teaching English for Academic Purposes. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 15(2).

Lin, L., & Reinders, H. (2019). Students’ and teachers’ readiness for autonomy: Beliefs and practices in developing autonomy in the Chinese context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(1), 69-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9564-3

Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy. 1: Definitions, issues and problems.Dublin: Authentik

Chan, V. (2001). Readiness for learner autonomy: What do our learners tell us? Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 505-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120078045

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research(3rd.ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education

Everhard, C.J., & Murphy, L. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment and autonomy in language learning.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Fereday, J.&Muir-Cochrane, E. (2008). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137414380

Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

Gall, M., Borg, W. & and Gall, J. (2004). Quantitative and qualitative research methods in educational sciences and psychology.Ahmad Reza Nasr et al. (Trans.). Tehran: SAMT

Little, D. (1995). Learning as dialogue: The dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy. System, 23(2), 175–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00006-6

Long, H. B. (1989). Self-directed learning: Emerging theory and practice.In Long, H.B. and Associates (Eds.) Self-Directed Learning: Emerging Theory and Practice. Norman, OK: Oklahoma Research Center for Continuing Professional and Higher Education of the University of Oklahoma, pp. 1-11.

Mauranen, A. (2016). English as the Academic Lingua Franca. English for Specific Purpose Journal, 3.Maggs-Rapport, F. (2000). Combining methodological approaches in research: Ethnography and interpretive phenomenology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(1), 219-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01243.x

Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Mintz, J., Branch, C., March, C., & Lerman, S. (2012). Key factors mediating the use of a mobile technology tool designed to develop social and life skills in children with Autistic Spectrum Disorders.Computers & Education,58(1), 53-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.013

Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

Nakata, Y. (2014). Self-regulation: Why is it important for promoting learner autonomyin the school context? Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 5(4), 342-356 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37237/050403

Oddi, L. F. (1987). Perspectives on self-directed learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 38.21-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848187038001003

Ogden, A., & Roulon, S. (2009). From field projects in anthropology: A student handbook. Illinois: Waveland Press Inc.

O’Reilly, K. (2008). Key concepts in ethnography. London: Sage.Oxford, R. L. (2011b). Research timeline: Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Language Teaching, 44(2), 167-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000492

Ponton, M. K., & Carr, P. B. (2000). Understanding and promoting autonomy in self-directed learning. Current research in social psychology, 5(19), 271-284.

Reksten, L. E. (2000). Using technology to increase student learning.California: Corwin Press, Inc.

Rivas, C. (2012). Coding and analysing qualitative data. In C. Searle (Ed.), Researching society and culture.London: SAGE Publications.

Robson, C. (2011). Real world research. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Shang, J. G., & Kou, J. N. (2015). The reciprocal effect of learners’ individual factors on learner autonomy. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching,(4), 63-67.

Swatevacharkul, R. (2008). An investigation on readiness for learner autonomy,approaches to learning of tertiary students and the roles of English language teachers in enhancing learner autonomy in higher education. Retrieved fromhttp://libdoc.dpu.ac.th/research/134463.pdf

Tesch, R. (2013).Qualitative research: Analysis types and software. Routledge.Thanasoulas, D. (2002). Motivation and Motivating in the Foreign Language Classroom. TESL Journal, 8(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315067339

Thavenius, C. (1999). Teacher autonomy for learner autonomy. In S. Cotterall & D. Crabbe (Eds.), Learner autonomy in languagelearning: Defining the field and effecting change (pp. 159–163).

Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Wolcott, H. F. (2008). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Maryland: Altamira

Press.

Yuliani, Y., & Lengkanawati, N. S. (2017). Project-based learning in promoting learner autonomy in an EFL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 285-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8131

Zimmerman, B. J., S. Bonner and R. Kovach (1996). Developing Self-Regulated Learners: Beyond Achievement to Self-Efficacy. Washington, DC: American PsychologicalAssociation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10213-000

Zhao, Y. (2009). Catching Up or Leading the Way. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.