EFL learners’ perception and attitude in synchronous meetings through Zoom videoconferencing
Article Sidebar
Published:
Apr 6, 2023
Keywords:
attitude, perception, technology acceptance model, videoconferencing, Zoom
Main Article Content
(1) * Ahmad Ridho Rojabi
Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
Indonesia
(2) Praptika Septi Femilia
Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Recently, incorporating technology in English as a foreign language (EFL) courses has been the topic of much debate. Technology can facilitate student interaction in the learning process and create an interactive and communicative classroom environment. Zoom is a solution for faculty members to engage and motivate students in virtual courses as it provides real interaction and direct feedback. This present study aimed to explore EFL students' perceptions as well as attitudes toward synchronous learning through Zoom Videoconferencing. The participants were 72 undergraduate students in the Intensive Reading course. The data was collected through questionnaires, observations, and interviews. The contents of the instrument were validated using expert judgment. The quantitative data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics while qualitative data were analyzed using thematic coding. The findings demonstrated that students had positive perceptions of Zoom videoconferencing in terms of actual use, perceived ease of use, intrinsic motivation, behavioral intention, and attitude. Further research into using Zoom videoconferencing to develop innovations in an online course is strongly recommended.
HIGHLIGHTS:
- Zoom videoconferencing provides several benefits in terms of actual use, perceived ease of use, and satisfaction. Positive perceptions among students are related to their habits as digital natives and adjustments in post-pandemic classroom instruction which integrate technology in the educational setting.
- The learners’ positive attitude, they were satisfied with the course content, they felt comfortable participating in group discussions since the faculty designed interesting tasks and well-instructions and explanations. By doing so, this fun atmosphere in the teaching and learning process could promote peer interaction and build their social community.
- Synchronous videoconferencing can create an accessible, flexible, and effective classroom environment, facilitate an engaging online learning environment, and increase interactive and communicative interaction between teachers and students. By doing so, faculty members can create virtual courses utilizing Zoom videoconferencing for live interaction and an engaging classroom environment.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Rojabi, A. R., & Praptika Septi Femilia. (2023). EFL learners’ perception and attitude in synchronous meetings through Zoom videoconferencing. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 8(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v8i1.1722
Issue
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmad Ridho Rojabi Rojabi, Praptika Septi Femilia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abra, T. (2021). Exploring the usefulness of mindfulness practices through Zoom meetings in reducing anxiety and/or stress of adults with learning and developmental disabilities during the COVID-19 Pandemic [Lesley University]. In Expressive Therapies Capstone Theses. https://digitalcommons.lesley.edu/expressive_theses/477
Akar, S. G. M. (2019). A Structural Model for Relationship between Web Pedagogic Content Knowledge and Technology Acceptance of Preservice Teachers. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2019.01.001
Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring students’ use of Zoom application in language course based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(4), 883–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R. (2020). Finding satisfaction: Intrinsic motivation for synchronous and asynchronous communication in the online language learning context. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2563–2583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10369-z
Bailey, D. R., Almusharraf, N., & Almusharraf, A. (2022). Video conferencing in the e-learning context: explaining learning outcome with the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7679–7698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10949-1
Bawanti, P. K. D., & Arifani, Y. (2021). The students’ perceptions of using Zoom application on mobile phone in improving speaking skills during online learning at Ban Loeiwangsai School, Loei Province, Thailand. Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.30587/jetlal.v5i1.2212
Bedenlier, S., Wunder, I., Gläser-zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kopp, B., Ziegler, A., & Händel, M. (2021). Generation invisible ?. Higher Education Students ’ ( Non ) Use of Webcams in Synchronous Online Learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2(2l), 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100068
Butler-Pascoe, M. E., & Wiburg, K. M. (2003). Technology and Teaching English Languge Learners. Pearson College Division. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&cluster=13372377541470257068&btnI=1&hl=en
Cahill, J. L. (2014). University professors ’ perceptions about the impact of integrating Google applications on students ’ communication and collaboration skills. Journal of Research Initiatives, 1(2), 1–17. https://digitalcommons.uncfsu.edu/jri/vol1/iss2/7/
Candarli, D., & Yuksel, H. G. (2012). Students’ perceptions of video-conferencing in the classrooms in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 357–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.663
Castelli, F. R., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021). Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3565–3576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7123
Cherry, K. (2022). Attitude in psychology definition, formation, changes. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/attitudes-how-they-form-change-shape-behavior-2795897
Cheung, A. (2021a). Language teaching during a pandemic: A case study of Zoom use by a secondary ESL teacher in Hong Kong. RELC Journal, January, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220981784
Cheung, A. (2021b). Synchronous online teaching, a blessing or a curse? Insights from EFL primary students’ interaction during online English lessons. System, 100(May), 102566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102566
Cilliers, L. (2016). Wiki acceptance by university students to improve collaboration in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(5), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1180255
Connor, C. M. D. (2019). Using Technology and Assessment to Personalize Instruction: Preventing Reading Problems. Prevention Science, 20(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0842-9
Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10, 314–324. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no2/croxton_0614.pdf
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00047-2
Eltahir, M. E., Alsalhi, N. R., Al-Qatawneh, S., AlQudah, H. A., & Jaradat, M. (2021). The impact of game-based learning (GBL) on students’ motivation, engagement and academic performance on an Arabic language grammar course in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3251–3278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10396-w
Guiter, G. E., Sapia, S., Wright, A. I., Hutchins, G. G. A., & Arayssi, T. (2021). Development of a remote online collaborative medical school pathology curriculum with clinical correlations, across several international sites, through the Covid-19 pandemic. Medical Science Educator, 31(2), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01212-2
Hampel, R. (2003). Theoretical perspectives and new practices in audio-graphic conferencing for language learning. ReCALL, 15(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344003000314
Haymon, C., & Wilson, A. (2020). Differentiated Reading Instruction With Technology for Advanced Middle School Students’ Reading Achievement. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.5590/jerap.2020.10.1.05
Healey, D. (2016). Language learning and technology: Past, present and future. (In F. Farr). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315657899-3/language-learning-technologydeborah-healey
Hong, K. S., Ridzuan, A. A., & Kuek, M. K. (2003). Students’ attitudes toward the use of the Internet for learning: A study at a university in Malaysia. Educational Technology and Society, 6(2), 45–49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.6.2.45
Hong, N. C. (2020). Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) through synchronous online teaching in English language preservice teacher education. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2020.09.06
Hornby, A. S. (2005). Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary of Current English. Oxford University Press. https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/4400/oxford-advanced-learners-dictionary.html
Hu, G. (2002). Recent important developments in secondary English-language teaching in the People's Republic of China. Language Culture and Curriculum, 15(1), 30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310208666631
Ismawati, D., & Prasetyo, I. (2020). Efektivitas pembelajaran menggunakan video zoom cloud meeting pada anak usia dini era pandemi covid-19 [The effectiveness of learning using video Zoom Cloud meetings in early childhood during the Covid-19 pandemic]. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.671
Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M., & Heiberger, G. (2013). Putting Twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement, and success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x
Knipe, D., & Lee, M. (2002). The quality of teaching and learning via videoconferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00265
Kohnke, L. (2021). GoSoapBox–Encourage participation and interaction in the language classroom. RELC Journal, 52(3), 648-650. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0033688219872570
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53(1), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235
Lai, P. C. (2017). The literature review of tehnology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002
Lala, G. (2014). The emergence and development of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Marketing from Information to Decision, 7, 149–160. https://www.ceeol.com/search/articledetail?id=48800
Landrum, B., Bannister, J., Garza, G., & Rhame, S. (2020). A class of one: Students’ satisfaction with online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 96(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1757592
Lee, A. R. (2021). Breaking through digital barriers: Exploring EFL students’ views of zoom breakout room experiences. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21(June), 510–524. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21..202106.510
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology ? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 40, 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
Li, L. (2017). New technologies and language learning. Palgrave. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cj.36015
Lo Iacono, V., Symonds, P., & Brown, D. (2016). Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociological Research Online, 21(12). https://doi.org/doi:10.5153/sro.3952
Mamtani, H., Karaliuniene, R., de Filippis, R., & Nagendrappa, S. (2021). Impact of videoconferencing applications on mental health. BJPsych International, 19(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1192/bji.2021.40
McClendon, C., Neugebauer, R. M., & King, A. (2017). Grit, growth mindset, and deliberate practice in online learning. Journal of Instructional Research, 6(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.9743/jir.2017.2
Mcdonald, S. M. (2012). Perception: A concept analysis [The University of Texas at Tyler]. https://doi.org/htt10.1111/j.2047-3095.2011.01198.x
McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2020). Using Mentimeter to elicit student responses in the EAP/ESP classroom. RELC Journal, 51(1), 198–2014. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0033688219890350
Oktaviani, S. (2021). Online lectures using Zoom application for undergraduate students during COVID-19 pandemic period. Risenologi, 6(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.47028/j.risenologi.2021.61.156
Oroujlou, N., & Vahedi, M. (2011). Motivation, attitude, and language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 994–1000. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.333
Putrawangsa, S., & Hasanah, U. (2018). Integrasi teknologi digital dalam pembelajaran di era industri 4.0 [Integration of digital technology in learning in the industrial era 4.0]. Jurnal Tatsqif, 16(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v16i1.203
Rahayu, D. (2020). Students’ e-learning experience through a synchronous Zoom web conference system. Journal of ELT Research: The Academic Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.22236/JER
Rassaei, E. (2017). Video chat vs. face-to-face recasts, learners’ interpretations and L2 development: a case of Persian EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1–2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1275702
Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10125/44466
Rini, R., Noorman, S. S., & Nafisah, N. (2021). Zoom-storytelling : An activity to reduce students’ speaking anxiety. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 21(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v21i2.36653
Robbins, J. (2005). Between “Hello” and “See you later”. Development of strategies for interpersonal communication in English by Japanese EFL students. Michigan University Press. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED409728.pdf
Rojabi, A. R. (2020). Exploring EFL students’ perception of online learning via Microsoft Teams: University level in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2349
Rojabi, A. R., Setiawan, S., Munir, A., Purwati, O., Safriyani, R., Hayuningtyas, N., Khodijah, S., & Amumpuni, R. S. (2022). Kahoot , is it fun or unfun ? Gamifying vocabulary learning to boost exam scores, engagement, and motivation. Frontiers in Education, 7(September), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.939884
Rojabi, A. R., Setiawan, S., Munir, A., Purwati, O., & Widyastuti. (2022). The camera-on or camera-off, is it a dilemma? Sparking engagement, motivation, and autonomy through Microsoft Teams videoconferencing. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 17(11), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i11.29061
Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203074640
Satar, H. M., & Özdener, N. (2008). The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 595–613.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00789.x
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model ( TAM ): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128(0317), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Serhan, D. (2020). Transitioning from face-to-face to remote learning: Students’ attitudes and perceptions of using Zoom during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.148
Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
Sutterlin, J. (2018). Learning is social with Zoom video conferencing in your classroom. Special Issue: Instructional Technology in the Online Classroom in Learn Magazine. https://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=3236697
Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2016). The influence of teachers ’ conceptions of teaching and learning on their technology acceptance. Interactive Learning Environment, 25(4), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844
Triyason, T., Tassanaviboon, A., & Kanthamanon, P. (2020). Hybrid classroom: Designing for the new normal after COVID-19 pandemic. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Information Technology (IAIT2020), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406601.3406635
Viswanathan, G. (2021). Blended Learning - the New Normal at Institutions of Higher Learning : A Case Study from Singapore. Doctor of Education of The University of Western Australia. https://doi.org/10.26182/nfwt-jd46
Yamada, M. (2009). The role of social presence in learner-centered communicative language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study. Computers and Education, 52(4), 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.007
Zoom Video Communications Inc. (2016). Security guide. Zoom Video Communications Inc. https://d24cgw3uvb9a9h.cloudfront.net/static/81625/doc/Zoom-Security-White-Paper.pdf
Akar, S. G. M. (2019). A Structural Model for Relationship between Web Pedagogic Content Knowledge and Technology Acceptance of Preservice Teachers. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2019.01.001
Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring students’ use of Zoom application in language course based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(4), 883–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R. (2020). Finding satisfaction: Intrinsic motivation for synchronous and asynchronous communication in the online language learning context. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2563–2583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10369-z
Bailey, D. R., Almusharraf, N., & Almusharraf, A. (2022). Video conferencing in the e-learning context: explaining learning outcome with the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7679–7698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10949-1
Bawanti, P. K. D., & Arifani, Y. (2021). The students’ perceptions of using Zoom application on mobile phone in improving speaking skills during online learning at Ban Loeiwangsai School, Loei Province, Thailand. Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.30587/jetlal.v5i1.2212
Bedenlier, S., Wunder, I., Gläser-zikuda, M., Kammerl, R., Kopp, B., Ziegler, A., & Händel, M. (2021). Generation invisible ?. Higher Education Students ’ ( Non ) Use of Webcams in Synchronous Online Learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2(2l), 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100068
Butler-Pascoe, M. E., & Wiburg, K. M. (2003). Technology and Teaching English Languge Learners. Pearson College Division. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&cluster=13372377541470257068&btnI=1&hl=en
Cahill, J. L. (2014). University professors ’ perceptions about the impact of integrating Google applications on students ’ communication and collaboration skills. Journal of Research Initiatives, 1(2), 1–17. https://digitalcommons.uncfsu.edu/jri/vol1/iss2/7/
Candarli, D., & Yuksel, H. G. (2012). Students’ perceptions of video-conferencing in the classrooms in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 357–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.663
Castelli, F. R., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021). Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3565–3576. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7123
Cherry, K. (2022). Attitude in psychology definition, formation, changes. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/attitudes-how-they-form-change-shape-behavior-2795897
Cheung, A. (2021a). Language teaching during a pandemic: A case study of Zoom use by a secondary ESL teacher in Hong Kong. RELC Journal, January, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220981784
Cheung, A. (2021b). Synchronous online teaching, a blessing or a curse? Insights from EFL primary students’ interaction during online English lessons. System, 100(May), 102566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102566
Cilliers, L. (2016). Wiki acceptance by university students to improve collaboration in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(5), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1180255
Connor, C. M. D. (2019). Using Technology and Assessment to Personalize Instruction: Preventing Reading Problems. Prevention Science, 20(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0842-9
Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10, 314–324. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no2/croxton_0614.pdf
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00047-2
Eltahir, M. E., Alsalhi, N. R., Al-Qatawneh, S., AlQudah, H. A., & Jaradat, M. (2021). The impact of game-based learning (GBL) on students’ motivation, engagement and academic performance on an Arabic language grammar course in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3251–3278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10396-w
Guiter, G. E., Sapia, S., Wright, A. I., Hutchins, G. G. A., & Arayssi, T. (2021). Development of a remote online collaborative medical school pathology curriculum with clinical correlations, across several international sites, through the Covid-19 pandemic. Medical Science Educator, 31(2), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01212-2
Hampel, R. (2003). Theoretical perspectives and new practices in audio-graphic conferencing for language learning. ReCALL, 15(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344003000314
Haymon, C., & Wilson, A. (2020). Differentiated Reading Instruction With Technology for Advanced Middle School Students’ Reading Achievement. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.5590/jerap.2020.10.1.05
Healey, D. (2016). Language learning and technology: Past, present and future. (In F. Farr). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315657899-3/language-learning-technologydeborah-healey
Hong, K. S., Ridzuan, A. A., & Kuek, M. K. (2003). Students’ attitudes toward the use of the Internet for learning: A study at a university in Malaysia. Educational Technology and Society, 6(2), 45–49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.6.2.45
Hong, N. C. (2020). Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) through synchronous online teaching in English language preservice teacher education. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2020.09.06
Hornby, A. S. (2005). Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary of Current English. Oxford University Press. https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/4400/oxford-advanced-learners-dictionary.html
Hu, G. (2002). Recent important developments in secondary English-language teaching in the People's Republic of China. Language Culture and Curriculum, 15(1), 30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310208666631
Ismawati, D., & Prasetyo, I. (2020). Efektivitas pembelajaran menggunakan video zoom cloud meeting pada anak usia dini era pandemi covid-19 [The effectiveness of learning using video Zoom Cloud meetings in early childhood during the Covid-19 pandemic]. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.671
Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M., & Heiberger, G. (2013). Putting Twitter to the test: Assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement, and success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01284.x
Knipe, D., & Lee, M. (2002). The quality of teaching and learning via videoconferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00265
Kohnke, L. (2021). GoSoapBox–Encourage participation and interaction in the language classroom. RELC Journal, 52(3), 648-650. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0033688219872570
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53(1), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235
Lai, P. C. (2017). The literature review of tehnology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002
Lala, G. (2014). The emergence and development of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Marketing from Information to Decision, 7, 149–160. https://www.ceeol.com/search/articledetail?id=48800
Landrum, B., Bannister, J., Garza, G., & Rhame, S. (2020). A class of one: Students’ satisfaction with online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 96(2), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1757592
Lee, A. R. (2021). Breaking through digital barriers: Exploring EFL students’ views of zoom breakout room experiences. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21(June), 510–524. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21..202106.510
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology ? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 40, 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
Li, L. (2017). New technologies and language learning. Palgrave. http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cj.36015
Lo Iacono, V., Symonds, P., & Brown, D. (2016). Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociological Research Online, 21(12). https://doi.org/doi:10.5153/sro.3952
Mamtani, H., Karaliuniene, R., de Filippis, R., & Nagendrappa, S. (2021). Impact of videoconferencing applications on mental health. BJPsych International, 19(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1192/bji.2021.40
McClendon, C., Neugebauer, R. M., & King, A. (2017). Grit, growth mindset, and deliberate practice in online learning. Journal of Instructional Research, 6(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.9743/jir.2017.2
Mcdonald, S. M. (2012). Perception: A concept analysis [The University of Texas at Tyler]. https://doi.org/htt10.1111/j.2047-3095.2011.01198.x
McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2020). Using Mentimeter to elicit student responses in the EAP/ESP classroom. RELC Journal, 51(1), 198–2014. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0033688219890350
Oktaviani, S. (2021). Online lectures using Zoom application for undergraduate students during COVID-19 pandemic period. Risenologi, 6(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.47028/j.risenologi.2021.61.156
Oroujlou, N., & Vahedi, M. (2011). Motivation, attitude, and language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 994–1000. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.333
Putrawangsa, S., & Hasanah, U. (2018). Integrasi teknologi digital dalam pembelajaran di era industri 4.0 [Integration of digital technology in learning in the industrial era 4.0]. Jurnal Tatsqif, 16(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v16i1.203
Rahayu, D. (2020). Students’ e-learning experience through a synchronous Zoom web conference system. Journal of ELT Research: The Academic Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.22236/JER
Rassaei, E. (2017). Video chat vs. face-to-face recasts, learners’ interpretations and L2 development: a case of Persian EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1–2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1275702
Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10125/44466
Rini, R., Noorman, S. S., & Nafisah, N. (2021). Zoom-storytelling : An activity to reduce students’ speaking anxiety. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 21(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v21i2.36653
Robbins, J. (2005). Between “Hello” and “See you later”. Development of strategies for interpersonal communication in English by Japanese EFL students. Michigan University Press. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED409728.pdf
Rojabi, A. R. (2020). Exploring EFL students’ perception of online learning via Microsoft Teams: University level in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2349
Rojabi, A. R., Setiawan, S., Munir, A., Purwati, O., Safriyani, R., Hayuningtyas, N., Khodijah, S., & Amumpuni, R. S. (2022). Kahoot , is it fun or unfun ? Gamifying vocabulary learning to boost exam scores, engagement, and motivation. Frontiers in Education, 7(September), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.939884
Rojabi, A. R., Setiawan, S., Munir, A., Purwati, O., & Widyastuti. (2022). The camera-on or camera-off, is it a dilemma? Sparking engagement, motivation, and autonomy through Microsoft Teams videoconferencing. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 17(11), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i11.29061
Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203074640
Satar, H. M., & Özdener, N. (2008). The effects of synchronous CMC on speaking proficiency and anxiety: Text versus voice chat. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 595–613.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00789.x
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model ( TAM ): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128(0317), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Serhan, D. (2020). Transitioning from face-to-face to remote learning: Students’ attitudes and perceptions of using Zoom during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.148
Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
Sutterlin, J. (2018). Learning is social with Zoom video conferencing in your classroom. Special Issue: Instructional Technology in the Online Classroom in Learn Magazine. https://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=3236697
Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2016). The influence of teachers ’ conceptions of teaching and learning on their technology acceptance. Interactive Learning Environment, 25(4), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143844
Triyason, T., Tassanaviboon, A., & Kanthamanon, P. (2020). Hybrid classroom: Designing for the new normal after COVID-19 pandemic. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Information Technology (IAIT2020), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406601.3406635
Viswanathan, G. (2021). Blended Learning - the New Normal at Institutions of Higher Learning : A Case Study from Singapore. Doctor of Education of The University of Western Australia. https://doi.org/10.26182/nfwt-jd46
Yamada, M. (2009). The role of social presence in learner-centered communicative language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: Experimental study. Computers and Education, 52(4), 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.007
Zoom Video Communications Inc. (2016). Security guide. Zoom Video Communications Inc. https://d24cgw3uvb9a9h.cloudfront.net/static/81625/doc/Zoom-Security-White-Paper.pdf