An Overreview of the Sociocultural Theory and Vocabulary Development Tinjauan Singkat Teori Sosial Budaya dan Pengembangan Kosakata
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
(1) * Khaled Ali Mohammed Alkurtehe
Universiti Utara Malaysia
Malaysia
(2) Hisham Dzakiria
Universiti Utara Malaysia
Malaysia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Vegotesky theory is a paramount for the vocabulary development with its multidimensional approach, which has the impact on the cognitive affective contextual aspects and social interaction.Socio-cultural theory(SCT) is the mental development of specific sphere human. It also concerns mediation and the different kinds of mediation tools adopted and valued by society.This paper highlighted that learning as a mediated process in social in origin and then becomes individual as a result of linguistically mediated interaction between the child and more experienced members of the society including parents, teachers, and peers. The relation of mediation of SCT and environment is to enhance vocabulary development in teaching EFL students. It also helps EFL students to use the target language in their daily life .With the help of this theory, the students can master vocabulary and improve their language.This theory focuses on the interaction with the students and shows the social environment. It links the learners with the trainer, if a child/student gets a guidance in an appropriate way he/she can learn more and can enhance his/her capacity of learning.This study tried to look at the influence of SCT on learning and teaching vocabulary. Consequently, This study recommends the use of the SCT while teaching EFL Libyan learners to enhance English language vocabulary.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2018 Khaled Ali Mohammed Alkurtehe, Hisham Dzakiria
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
References
Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21-34.
Al-Dersi, Z. E. M. (2013). The use of short-stories for developing vocabulary of EFL learners. International Refereed & Indexed Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 2308-5460.
Al-Shuwairekh, S. (2001). Vocabulary learning strategies used by AFL (Arabic as a Foreign Language) learners in Saudi Arabia(Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds).
Behroozizad, S., Nambiar, R. M., & Amir, Z. (2014). Sociocultural theory as an approach to aid EFL learners. Reading, 14(2).
Chernova, N. A., &Mustafina, J. N. (2016).The problem of encouraging educational activity as a way of investigating some interplay between sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Russian linguistic Bulletin, (2), 50-51.
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 33456
Ellis, R., & He, X. (1999).The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings. Studies in second language acquisition, 21(2), 285-301
Fareh, S. (2010). Challenges of teaching English in the Arab world: Why can’t EFL programs deliver as expected?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3600-3604.
Gibbons, P., 2002. Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. NH: Heinemann, Portsmouth
Gass, S., &Selinker, L. (2001). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Juffs, A., &Friedline, B. E. (2014). Sociocultural influences on the use of a web-based tool for learning English vocabulary. System, 42, 48-59.
Khan, I. A. (2011).Challenges of teaching/learning English and management. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research, 11(8).70-72.
Kozulin, A., 2002. Sociocultural theory and the mediated learning experience. School Psychology International, Sage Publications
Lantolf, J.P., 2000. Introducing sociocultural theory. In: Lantolf, J. P., ed. Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press, 1-26 Lin, M., and Mackay, C., 2004. Thinking through modern foreign languages. UK:
Lantolf, J. P., Thorne, S. L., &Poehner, M. E. (2015).Sociocultural theory and second language development. Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction, 207-226.
Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.
Parrila, R. K., 1995. Vygotskian views on language and planning in children. School Psychology International. Sage Publication
Saigh, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Difficulties with vocabulary word form: The case of Arabic ESL learners. System, 40(1), 24-36.
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass& C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in Second LanguageAcquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Shayer, M., 2002. Not just Piaget, not just Vygotsky, and certainly not Vygotsky as an alternative to Piaget. In: Shayer, M., ed. Learning intelligence, cognitive acceleration across the curriculum from 5 to 15 years. UK: Open University Press
Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. L. F. (2009). Improving students' reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 272-286.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 23(3), 34-41.
Wilkins, D. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. London, UK: Arnold
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.